| Cothran,
Donetta J. and Catherine D. Ennis. “Building
Bridges to Student Engagement: Communicating
Respect and Care for Students in Urban High
Schools,” in McMillan, James H. and
Jon F.
Wergin,
eds.
Understanding and Evaluating Educational Research.
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill
Prentice Hall,
2002.
Educational engagement is a prerequisite
for academic success (Montgomery
& Rossi, 1994).
Even
a quality curriculum guided by a knowledgeable
teacher will not result in student learning
unless students first are engaged in the
learning process.
Unfortunately, the number of disengaged
students may exceed two-thirds of the student
population in high schools (Sedlak,
Wheeler, Pullin & Cusick, 1986).
Some
of these students may be at risk for dropping
out of school and most are at risk for minimal
involvement and therefore minimal learning
in school.
Engagement
is defined as the willingness of students
to make the “psychological investment
required to comprehend and master knowledge
and skills” (Wehlage,
Rutter, Smith, Lesko, & Fernandez, 1989,
p. 177).
The importance of student engagement in
learning is a common theme in the educational
literature and is related, at least in part,
to the current popularity of constructivist
learning theories.
For sociocultural theorists, student involvement
in culturally organized activity is central
to the educational process, while more individually
focused constructivists focus on the sensory-motor
and conceptual activity of the student (Cobb,
1994).
From both theoretical perspectives, however,
the student’s active engagement is
a key concept in the learning process.
In addition to its importance to learning,
educational engagement is also a key component
in student
retention.
Finn’s (1989)
review of the literature related to student
withdrawal and disengagement from schools
described two primary models posited to
explain this phenomenon. |